Large Language Model (LLM) chatbot systems are rapidly becoming integral components of enterprise customer service, internal knowledge management, and business process automation. Unlike traditional rule-based chatbots, modern LLM-based systems can handle complex customer inquiries, access company knowledge bases, maintain context throughout multi-turn conversations, and deliver natural human-like interactions.
Enterprise adoption of LLM technologies introduces unique quality assurance challenges:
- Non-deterministic outputs: LLMs may produce variable responses to identical inputs
- Context sensitivity: Responses change based on conversation history and input variations
- Alignment evaluation: Ensuring outputs conform to company policies and requirements
- Hallucination detection: Identifying when an LLM provides incorrect information
- Bias and toxicity measurement: Mitigating potential risks from problematic outputs
ACCELQ No-Code Automation for Enterprise LLM Testing
ACCELQ's enterprise-grade no-code automation platform offers specialized commands for LLM testing that enable QA professionals to systematically evaluate chatbot performance without requiring specialized AI expertise.
Supported LLM Testing Commands
1. Verify LLM Response Metric
This command evaluates individual LLM responses against specific quality metrics.
Available Metrics:
Metric | Description | When to Use |
Answer Relevancy | Measures how well the response addresses the prompt | For evaluating if responses stay on topic |
Faithfulness | Assesses if the response contains factual inaccuracies | For checking factual reliability |
Contextual Precision | Measures precision when context is provided | For evaluating retrieval-augmented responses |
Contextual Recall | Evaluates recall when context is provided | For ensuring all relevant information is included |
Contextual Relevancy | Measures relevance of response to provided context | For testing context incorporation |
Bias | Detects potential biases in responses | For fairness testing |
Toxicity | Measures harmful, offensive, or inappropriate content | For safety testing |
Summarization | Evaluates quality of summarized content | For testing summary capabilities |
Prompt Alignment | Checks if response follows specific instructions | For evaluating instruction following |
Hallucination | Detects fabricated information |
For ensuring factual accuracy |
For verifying a metric, users should input an acceptable pass threshold in the LLM verification command. This value varies between 0 and 1. While there is no precise formula to arrive at these thresholds, refer to this article for guidelines in establishing threshold values appropriate for your specific application requirements.
2. Verify LLM Conversational Metric
This command evaluates entire conversations rather than individual exchanges.
Conversation JSON Parameter
The command requires a JSON object that defines the conversation to be evaluated. This JSON must include a 'chatbot_role' string describing the expected role of the assistant (applicable only for the role adherence parameter), a 'turns' array containing conversation exchanges with each turn having 'input' (user message) and 'output' (chatbot response) fields, and a 'threshold' decimal value between 0 and 1 representing the minimum acceptable score. Here's one example:
{
"chatbot_role": "Description of the assistant's expected behavior",
"turns": [
{
"input": "User message",
"output": "Assistant response"
}
],
"threshold": 0.75
}
Available Conversational Metrics:
Metric | Description | When to Use |
Role Adherence | Measures how well the LLM maintains its assigned role | For evaluating persona consistency |
Knowledge Retention | Assesses the LLM's ability to retain information | For testing memory across conversation |
Conversation Completeness | Evaluates if all parts of a query are addressed | For checking thoroughness |
Conversation Relevancy | Measures overall topical consistency | For evaluating conversation coherence |
3. Generate LLM Metrics Report
This command produces comprehensive analytical summaries at either the test case or test job level. It summarizes all the LLM verifications so far in your test logic and outputs an aggregated summary in the report.
Implementation Details
Command Framework for LLM Verifications
This command framework utilizes LLM for verification operations. Users must provide their own LLM API key in the file api_key.properties
located in the agent\software\accelq\add_ons\llm
directory. The file should contain the property open_api_key=<key_value>
Report Generation Capabilities
The "Generate LLM Metrics Report" command aggregates results from previous verification calls, presenting statistical data such as pass/fail counts, average metric values, and median scores. This command can compile metrics either from the current test case or across the entire test job execution.
For optimal implementation, this command should be placed within a Teardown Action to execute after test completion, ensuring a comprehensive overview of all verification points. Learn more about Teardown Actions.
Implementing LLM Testing with ACCELQ
Basic Testing Workflow
-
Configure Your Test Environment:
- Set up access to your LLM system
- Define test data and expected outcomes
- Configure threshold values for each metric (For more info, visit: https://support.accelq.com/hc/en-us/articles/35065967101197-Setting-Effective-Threshold-Values-for-LLM-Testing-in-Enterprise-QA)
-
Create Test Cases:
- Design prompts that test various aspects of your LLM
- Include edge cases and potential problematic inputs
- Structure test cases to evaluate specific functionality
-
Execute Tests:
- Run tests individually or as part of a test suite
- Monitor real-time results as tests execute
- Review detailed metric scores for each test
-
Analyze Results:
- Use the Generate LLM Metrics Report command for comprehensive analysis
- Identify areas for improvement
- Compare performance across different versions of your LLM
Example Test Scenario
Goal: Evaluate a customer service chatbot's ability to provide accurate product information.
// Test 1: Basic Information Retrieval
Verify LLM standard metric Answer Relevancy with input (prompt): "What are the dimensions of the Model X smartphone?",
actual output: "The Model X smartphone dimensions are 150.9 x 75.7 x 8.3 mm (5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 in).",
threshold value: 0.8
// Test 2: Factual Accuracy
Verify LLM standard metric Faithfulness with input (prompt): "What is the battery capacity of the Model X?",
actual output: "The Model X features a 4500mAh battery with fast charging capabilities.",
retrieval context: "Model X specifications: 4500mAh battery, 67W fast charging, 15W wireless charging",
threshold value: 0.9
// Test 3: Instruction Following
Verify LLM standard metric Prompt Alignment with input (prompt): "List the three main camera features of Model X in bullet points.",
actual output: "• 108MP main camera with OIS\n• 13MP ultrawide lens\n• 5MP macro camera with 4cm focal distance",
prompt instructions: "Respond with bullet points; Keep it concise; Focus only on camera specifications",
threshold value: 0.85
// Generate Summary Report
Generate LLM Metrics Report at the test-suite level
Best Practices for LLM Testing
- Test Diverse Scenarios: Include a wide range of inputs to evaluate different aspects of your LLM.
- Set Appropriate Thresholds: Calibrate threshold values based on your specific requirements and use case.
- Leverage Contextual Testing: Use retrieval context parameters to evaluate how well your LLM integrates external information.
- Regular Regression Testing: Re-run tests when updating your model to ensure consistent quality.
- Combine Metrics: Use multiple metrics together to get a comprehensive view of performance.
Comments
0 comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.